Friday, September 24, 2010

Kidunguënewn Nguen!

In spite of the social and political advances of the last time, specially the signing of the Human Rights and the eradication of most of the torture and slavery practices in the west, there's still in our conscience the deep idea about the inferiority of some races, a colonialist thought, which keep us believeing in a specific code of beauty (the caucasian) and an admiration for ancient and actual european culture. All this things make us think that our ethnical origins are brut, thick or mentally inferior. So we deny them, and extol our european genes, the spanish ones.
Because of this, we use to pretend that the lands that were stolen to the mapuche people were made the most by the spaniards or their sons. But the matter is not if the mapuche did or did not take advantage of their lands, the matter is that there was steal, which one to the eyes of the prevailing capitalism was not...
They don't care about in-touch-care of land, or the attachment to nature, they just care about the production, and the profits, of course. So, the lands that we could say were "by right" theirs, were taken by the wealthy only because the mapuche had no legal papers that said those lands were from their property. They didn't understand the belongings to the land of the men and the men to the land. In those times (and today is quite similaire), the land that is not sown and profitable is for bed or transitable way, but any other use must be lucrative, because it's all about the productive system.
The mapuche interests, which are more related to the religion and rituals, were not important for the landlords, and not even important nowadays. They sow the land and celebrate the good harvests, but they produce for themselves, not in a production scale like the merchant system.
"Independence. Freedom.
kidungüneun./ To live independently, in freedom: kidunguënewn nguen"

3 comments:

  1. http://www.csun.edu/~vcpsy00h/seattle.htm

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Cami!
    I think that the saddest thing about the expropriation of the lands it’s the one you mentioned, those are land that were taken away for exploitation and the deforestation. How can someone steal lands, destroy them and think that that it’s legitimate?

    Well, good bye. Have a great weekend!

    ReplyDelete
  3. answering Nardy. I guess because the state has been an accomplice and so have the media. As a result, nobody cares. I think

    ReplyDelete